Kjeldahl v. Espy
Kjeldahl v. Espy is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/20/1994 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 09/15/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James M. Rosenbaum · 5,933 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:94-cv-01051
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/20/1994
- Date terminated
- 09/15/1995
2,109 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kjeldahl v. Espy?
Kjeldahl v. Espy is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/20/1994 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 09/15/1995. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 4:94-cv-01051.
When was the case filed?
Kjeldahl v. Espy was filed on 12/20/1994. It was terminated on 09/15/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13652348 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:94-cv-01051 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).