Kloth v. Microsoft Corporatio
Kloth v. Microsoft Corporatio is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 12/20/1999 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 05/16/2000.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Walter H. Rice · 3,907 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:99-cv-01043
- Nature of suit
- 410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/20/1999
- Date terminated
- 05/16/2000
217 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Kloth · 10 cases
- defendant · Microsoft Corporatio · 100 cases
About Antitrust Lawsuits
Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kloth v. Microsoft Corporatio?
Kloth v. Microsoft Corporatio is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 12/20/1999 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 05/16/2000. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 1:99-cv-01043.
When was the case filed?
Kloth v. Microsoft Corporatio was filed on 12/20/1999. It was terminated on 05/16/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Antitrust Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 11025510).