Konicov v. Banfill
Konicov v. Banfill is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/03/1995 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/16/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr · 2,440 cases in index
- Docket number
- 8:95-cv-00003
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/03/1995
- Date terminated
- 05/16/1995
2,667 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Konicov v. Banfill?
Konicov v. Banfill is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/03/1995 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/16/1995. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 8:95-cv-00003.
When was the case filed?
Konicov v. Banfill was filed on 01/03/1995. It was terminated on 05/16/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 34914265 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:95-cv-00003 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).