Kroll v. Finnerty
Kroll v. Finnerty is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/30/1997 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/12/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Arthur D. Spatt · 6,791 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:97-cv-03796
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/30/1997
- Date terminated
- 11/12/1999
1,287 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kroll v. Finnerty?
Kroll v. Finnerty is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/30/1997 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/12/1999. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 9:97-cv-03796.
When was the case filed?
Kroll v. Finnerty was filed on 06/30/1997. It was terminated on 11/12/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10941343 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:97-cv-03796 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).