Kush v. Amer States Etal
Kush v. Amer States Etal is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 03/03/1987 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 07/17/1987.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 110 Insurance
Disputes over an insurance policy — denial of a claim, the scope of coverage, or an insurer's alleged bad-faith handling. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 03/03/1987
- Date terminated
- 07/17/1987
32,277 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Kush · 21 cases
- defendant · Amer States Etal · 3 cases
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kush v. Amer States Etal?
Kush v. Amer States Etal is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 03/03/1987 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 07/17/1987. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois.
When was the case filed?
Kush v. Amer States Etal was filed on 03/03/1987. It was terminated on 07/17/1987.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 8637147).