Labr v. Curry
Labr v. Curry is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/27/1993 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 09/14/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- S Arthur Spiegel · 2,397 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:93-cv-00351
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 05/27/1993
- Date terminated
- 09/14/1993
4,598 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Labr v. Curry?
Labr v. Curry is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/27/1993 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 09/14/1993. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 1:93-cv-00351.
When was the case filed?
Labr v. Curry was filed on 05/27/1993. It was terminated on 09/14/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13615091 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:93-cv-00351 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).