Labr v. Forney Industries
Labr v. Forney Industries is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/04/1992 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 06/11/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 1:92-mc-00041
- Cause
- Civil Miscellaneous Case
- Nature of suit
- 999 Invalid
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 06/04/1992
- Date terminated
- 06/11/1992
2,445 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Labr · 627 cases
- defendant · Forney Industries · 5 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Forney Industries is named in 5 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Labr v. Forney Industries?
Labr v. Forney Industries is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/04/1992 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 06/11/1992. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:92-mc-00041.
When was the case filed?
Labr v. Forney Industries was filed on 06/04/1992. It was terminated on 06/11/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 24572230 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:92-mc-00041 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).