Langley v. Agri
Langley v. Agri is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/11/2001 in the District Court, E.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 08/29/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Arkansas (E.D. Ark.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James M. Moody · 1,469 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:01-cv-00157
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 05/11/2001
- Date terminated
- 08/29/2002
1,070 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Langley v. Agri?
Langley v. Agri is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/11/2001 in the District Court, E.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 08/29/2002. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Arkansas, docket number 5:01-cv-00157.
When was the case filed?
Langley v. Agri was filed on 05/11/2001. It was terminated on 08/29/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 25216791 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:01-cv-00157 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).