Latimore v. Plastican, Inc
Latimore v. Plastican, Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/09/1997 in the District Court, M.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 12/23/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Georgia (M.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Hugh Lawson · 2,044 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:97-cv-00111
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/09/1997
- Date terminated
- 12/23/1998
233 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Latimore · 71 cases
- defendant · Plastican, Inc · 6 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Plastican, Inc is named in 6 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Latimore v. Plastican, Inc?
Latimore v. Plastican, Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/09/1997 in the District Court, M.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 12/23/1998. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Georgia, docket number 5:97-cv-00111.
When was the case filed?
Latimore v. Plastican, Inc was filed on 04/09/1997. It was terminated on 12/23/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10491945 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:97-cv-00111 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).