Lee v. Gmac
Lee v. Gmac is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/25/1996 in the District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 09/06/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Oklahoma (E.D. Okla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James H. Payne · 981 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:96-cv-00037
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 01/25/1996
- Date terminated
- 09/06/1996
253 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Lee v. Gmac?
Lee v. Gmac is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/25/1996 in the District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 09/06/1996. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Oklahoma, docket number 6:96-cv-00037.
When was the case filed?
Lee v. Gmac was filed on 01/25/1996. It was terminated on 09/06/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10265956 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:96-cv-00037 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).