Lomas&Nettleton v. Bundy Etal
Lomas&Nettleton v. Bundy Etal is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 04/08/1988 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 01/12/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Indiana (N.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 220 Foreclosure
Actions to foreclose on a mortgage or other lien against real property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/08/1988
- Date terminated
- 01/12/1990
1,107 Real Property cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Lomas and Nettleton · 45 cases
- defendant · Bundy Etal · 2 cases
About Real Property Lawsuits
Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Lomas&Nettleton v. Bundy Etal?
Lomas&Nettleton v. Bundy Etal is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 04/08/1988 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 01/12/1990. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Real Property” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Indiana.
When was the case filed?
Lomas&Nettleton v. Bundy Etal was filed on 04/08/1988. It was terminated on 01/12/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Real Property Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8856074 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).