Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Labor Lawsuit

Lomax v. Wade

Labor Terminated 11/08/2006 District Court, D. Massachusetts

Lomax v. Wade is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 08/28/2006 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 11/08/2006.

Court
District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Nancy Gertner · 2,562 cases in index
Docket number
1:06-cv-11536
Nature of suit
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
08/28/2006
Date terminated
11/08/2006

9,847 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Lomax · 169 cases
  • defendant · Wade · 1431 cases

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lomax v. Wade?

Lomax v. Wade is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 08/28/2006 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 11/08/2006. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:06-cv-11536.

When was the case filed?

Lomax v. Wade was filed on 08/28/2006. It was terminated on 11/08/2006.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Labor Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 12201815).