Long v. McNally
Long v. McNally is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/15/1999 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 08/28/2000.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ann D. Montgomery · 4,730 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:99-cv-00597
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 04/15/1999
- Date terminated
- 08/28/2000
4,756 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Long v. McNally?
Long v. McNally is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/15/1999 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 08/28/2000. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:99-cv-00597.
When was the case filed?
Long v. McNally was filed on 04/15/1999. It was terminated on 08/28/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11051292 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:99-cv-00597 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).