Long v. Telectronics Pacing
Long v. Telectronics Pacing is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 09/05/1996 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 03/05/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 1:96-cv-00882
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/05/1996
- Date terminated
- 03/05/1999
1,124 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Long · 3019 cases
- defendant · Telectronics Pacing · 264 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Long v. Telectronics Pacing?
Long v. Telectronics Pacing is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 09/05/1996 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 03/05/1999. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 1:96-cv-00882.
When was the case filed?
Long v. Telectronics Pacing was filed on 09/05/1996. It was terminated on 03/05/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10603850 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:96-cv-00882 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).