Luhn v. Sturgess
Luhn v. Sturgess is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 02/10/2004 in the District Court, S.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 03/09/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Texas (S.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David Hittner · 5,503 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:04-cv-00515
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 02/10/2004
- Date terminated
- 03/09/2004
1,544 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Luhn v. Sturgess?
Luhn v. Sturgess is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 02/10/2004 in the District Court, S.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 03/09/2004. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Texas, docket number 4:04-cv-00515.
When was the case filed?
Luhn v. Sturgess was filed on 02/10/2004. It was terminated on 03/09/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14065023 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:04-cv-00515 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).