Lydall Cen Inc v. Baxter Intl Inc

Court

District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

James H. Alesia · 2,229 cases in index

Docket number

1:94-cv-04153

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

None

Date filed

07/08/1994

Date terminated

11/03/1994

32,275 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Lydall Cen Inc
• defendant · Baxter International Medical Devices & Equipment · 837 cases

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lydall Cen Inc v. Baxter Intl Inc?

Lydall Cen Inc v. Baxter Intl Inc is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 07/08/1994 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 11/03/1994. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:94-cv-04153.

When was the case filed?

Lydall Cen Inc v. Baxter Intl Inc was filed on 07/08/1994. It was terminated on 11/03/1994.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.