MacFarlane v. Citibank, N.A
MacFarlane v. Citibank, N.A is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 12/30/2020 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 09/06/2022.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California (N.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Beth Labson Freeman · 1,787 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:20-cv-09437
- Cause
- 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1441 — Removal from state court - Nature of suit
- 190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 12/30/2020
- Date terminated
- 09/06/2022
25,026 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · MacFarlane · 45 cases
- defendant · Citibank, N.A · 1387 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Citibank, N.A is named in 1,387 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Contract cases naming the same defendant:
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MacFarlane v. Citibank, N.A?
MacFarlane v. Citibank, N.A is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 12/30/2020 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 09/06/2022. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. California, docket number 5:20-cv-09437.
When was the case filed?
MacFarlane v. Citibank, N.A was filed on 12/30/2020. It was terminated on 09/06/2022.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1441 — Removal from state court.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 26999497 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:20-cv-09437 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).