Maeso v. Caro
Maeso v. Caro is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/30/2003 in the District Court, D. Puerto Rico. The case was terminated on 08/11/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Puerto Rico (D.P.R.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jose A. Fuste · 2,010 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:03-cv-01719
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/30/2003
- Date terminated
- 08/11/2004
93 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Maeso v. Caro?
Maeso v. Caro is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/30/2003 in the District Court, D. Puerto Rico. The case was terminated on 08/11/2004. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Puerto Rico, docket number 3:03-cv-01719.
When was the case filed?
Maeso v. Caro was filed on 06/30/2003. It was terminated on 08/11/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11713990 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:03-cv-01719 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).