Mahmoud v. Woods
Mahmoud v. Woods is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 07/16/1990 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 11/07/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John M. Manos · 1,682 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:90-cv-01251
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 07/16/1990
- Date terminated
- 11/07/1990
5,824 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mahmoud v. Woods?
Mahmoud v. Woods is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 07/16/1990 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 11/07/1990. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 1:90-cv-01251.
When was the case filed?
Mahmoud v. Woods was filed on 07/16/1990. It was terminated on 11/07/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9197035 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:90-cv-01251 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).