Malaco Inc v. Cox
Malaco Inc v. Cox is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/03/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 03/13/2006.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sharon Lovelace Blackburn · 3,272 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:03-cv-00016
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/03/2003
- Date terminated
- 03/13/2006
295 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Malaco Inc · 37 cases
- defendant · Cox · 3706 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Malaco Inc v. Cox?
Malaco Inc v. Cox is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/03/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 03/13/2006. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 2:03-cv-00016.
When was the case filed?
Malaco Inc v. Cox was filed on 01/03/2003. It was terminated on 03/13/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12187850 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:03-cv-00016 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).