Mance v. Cahaly
Mance v. Cahaly is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 10/21/1987 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 12/21/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. South Carolina (D.S.C.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 8:87-dv-02865
- Nature of suit
- 710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/21/1987
- Date terminated
- 12/21/1988
8,608 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mance v. Cahaly?
Mance v. Cahaly is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 10/21/1987 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 12/21/1988. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. South Carolina, docket number 8:87-dv-02865.
When was the case filed?
Mance v. Cahaly was filed on 10/21/1987. It was terminated on 12/21/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8796613 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:87-dv-02865 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).