Manuel v. Verizon Wireless

Court

District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Alison J. Nathan · 1,634 cases in index

Docket number

1:18-cv-06869

Cause

15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
15 U.S.C. § 1681 — Fair Credit Reporting Act

Nature of suit

480 Consumer Credit
Claims under consumer-credit statutes such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

07/31/2018

Date terminated

11/13/2018

5,208 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Manuel · 417 cases
• defendant · Verizon Wireless · 265 cases

About RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Lawsuits

This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Manuel v. Verizon Wireless?

Manuel v. Verizon Wireless is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 07/31/2018 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/13/2018. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:18-cv-06869.

When was the case filed?

Manuel v. Verizon Wireless was filed on 07/31/2018. It was terminated on 11/13/2018.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1681 — Fair Credit Reporting Act.