Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Labor Lawsuit

Mareno v. Keystone Automotive

Labor Terminated 01/17/2002 District Court, S.D. Alabama

Mareno v. Keystone Automotive is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/07/2000 in the District Court, S.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 01/17/2002.

Court
District Court, S.D. Alabama (S.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Charles R. Butler, Jr · 1,729 cases in index
Docket number
1:00-cv-01059
Nature of suit
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
12/07/2000
Date terminated
01/17/2002

1,144 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mareno v. Keystone Automotive?

Mareno v. Keystone Automotive is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/07/2000 in the District Court, S.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 01/17/2002. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Alabama, docket number 1:00-cv-01059.

When was the case filed?

Mareno v. Keystone Automotive was filed on 12/07/2000. It was terminated on 01/17/2002.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Labor Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 11501090).