Martin v. Bennett
Martin v. Bennett is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/11/2008 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 09/22/2008.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Louisiana (E.D. La.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Mary Ann Vial Lemmon · 3,031 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:08-cv-03919
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 07/11/2008
- Date terminated
- 09/22/2008
4,472 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Martin v. Bennett?
Martin v. Bennett is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/11/2008 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 09/22/2008. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana, docket number 2:08-cv-03919.
When was the case filed?
Martin v. Bennett was filed on 07/11/2008. It was terminated on 09/22/2008.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12480358 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:08-cv-03919 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).