Martinez v. Hunter
Martinez v. Hunter is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/13/2008 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/27/2008.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- A. Joe Fish · 4,943 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:08-cv-00812
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/13/2008
- Date terminated
- 05/27/2008
2,448 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Martinez v. Hunter?
Martinez v. Hunter is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/13/2008 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/27/2008. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:08-cv-00812.
When was the case filed?
Martinez v. Hunter was filed on 05/13/2008. It was terminated on 05/27/2008.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12484708 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:08-cv-00812 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).