Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuit

Matlack v. Faygo

Personal Property / Fraud Terminated 02/09/1988 District Court, N.D. Ohio

Matlack v. Faygo is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/10/1987 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/09/1988.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
—
Nature of suit
380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property.
Jurisdiction
Diversity of citizenship
Date filed
09/10/1987
Date terminated
02/09/1988

1,743 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits

These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Matlack v. Faygo?

Matlack v. Faygo is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/10/1987 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/09/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio.

When was the case filed?

Matlack v. Faygo was filed on 09/10/1987. It was terminated on 02/09/1988.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8626039 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).