Matous v. Summit Bank
Matous v. Summit Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/09/2004 in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 03/21/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Arkansas (W.D. Ark.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jimm Larry Hendren · 2,436 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:04-cv-06043
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/09/2004
- Date terminated
- 03/21/2005
146 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Matous · 8 cases
- defendant · Summit Bank · 40 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
SUMMIT BANK is named in 40 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Matous v. Summit Bank?
Matous v. Summit Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/09/2004 in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 03/21/2005. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas, docket number 6:04-cv-06043.
When was the case filed?
Matous v. Summit Bank was filed on 04/09/2004. It was terminated on 03/21/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12008628 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:04-cv-06043 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).