Matsuda v. The Hershey Company

Court

District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Susan D. Wigenton · 5,262 cases in index

Docket number

2:08-cv-00191

Cause

15:1 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act

Nature of suit

410 Anti-Trust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

01/09/2008

Date terminated

04/15/2008

1,189 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Matsuda · 12 cases
• defendant · The Hershey Company Food Processing & Manufacturing · 158 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 159 Antitrust cases in our index naming The Hershey Company — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Supervalu Inc v. The Hershey Company
  District Court, M.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 05/10/2010
• Supervalu Inc v. The Hershey Company
  District Court, E.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 03/29/2010
• The Golub Corporation v. The Hershey Company
  District Court, M.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 12/04/2009
• The Golub Corporation v. The Hershey Company
  District Court, E.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 10/21/2009
• Cresswell v. Hershey Company
  District Court, M.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 08/19/2008
• Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc v. The Hershey Company
  District Court, M.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 08/11/2008

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Matsuda v. The Hershey Company?

Matsuda v. The Hershey Company is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 01/09/2008 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 04/15/2008. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey, docket number 2:08-cv-00191.

When was the case filed?

Matsuda v. The Hershey Company was filed on 01/09/2008. It was terminated on 04/15/2008.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act.