Mattingly v. Ward
Mattingly v. Ward is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 08/03/2000 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 08/31/2001.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Anne C. Conway · 13,775 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:00-cv-01002
- Nature of suit
- 690 Other forfeiture and penalty suits
Other civil forfeiture or federal penalty actions. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/03/2000
- Date terminated
- 08/31/2001
375 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.
About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mattingly v. Ward?
Mattingly v. Ward is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 08/03/2000 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 08/31/2001. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 6:00-cv-01002.
When was the case filed?
Mattingly v. Ward was filed on 08/03/2000. It was terminated on 08/31/2001.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13943748 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:00-cv-01002 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).