May v. Millspaugh
May v. Millspaugh is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/09/2004 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 08/31/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Kansas (D. Kan.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- J. Thomas Marten · 1,770 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:04-cv-01010
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/09/2004
- Date terminated
- 08/31/2004
356 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · May · 1472 cases
- defendant · Millspaugh · 16 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is May v. Millspaugh?
May v. Millspaugh is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/09/2004 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 08/31/2004. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Kansas, docket number 6:04-cv-01010.
When was the case filed?
May v. Millspaugh was filed on 01/09/2004. It was terminated on 08/31/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11867842 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:04-cv-01010 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).