Maybin v. Gilbert
Maybin v. Gilbert is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/28/1989 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 11/21/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. South Carolina (D.S.C.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 7:89-dv-01898
- Nature of suit
- 371 Truth in lending
Claims under the Truth in Lending Act over consumer-credit disclosures. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/28/1989
- Date terminated
- 11/21/1989
20,898 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Maybin v. Gilbert?
Maybin v. Gilbert is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/28/1989 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 11/21/1989. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. South Carolina, docket number 7:89-dv-01898.
When was the case filed?
Maybin v. Gilbert was filed on 07/28/1989. It was terminated on 11/21/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8987508 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 7:89-dv-01898 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).