Mayes v. Louk
Mayes v. Louk is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 08/28/2012 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 06/25/2013.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David M. Lawson · 2,428 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:12-cv-13793
- Nature of suit
- 480 Consumer credit
Claims under consumer-credit statutes such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/28/2012
- Date terminated
- 06/25/2013
3,746 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in this court are indexed here.
About RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Lawsuits
This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mayes v. Louk?
Mayes v. Louk is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 08/28/2012 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 06/25/2013. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:12-cv-13793.
When was the case filed?
Mayes v. Louk was filed on 08/28/2012. It was terminated on 06/25/2013.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 12996770).