Mbna v. Vrla
Mbna v. Vrla is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/15/2004 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 05/05/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ann D. Montgomery · 4,730 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:04-cv-01221
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/15/2004
- Date terminated
- 05/05/2004
4,756 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mbna v. Vrla?
Mbna v. Vrla is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/15/2004 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 05/05/2004. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:04-cv-01221.
When was the case filed?
Mbna v. Vrla was filed on 03/15/2004. It was terminated on 05/05/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11826262 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:04-cv-01221 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).