Mcdermott v. Stabitex Etal
Mcdermott v. Stabitex Etal is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/30/1986 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/16/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/30/1986
- Date terminated
- 06/16/1988
764 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · McDermott · 429 cases
- defendant · Stabitex Etal
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mcdermott v. Stabitex Etal?
Mcdermott v. Stabitex Etal is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/30/1986 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/16/1988. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio.
When was the case filed?
Mcdermott v. Stabitex Etal was filed on 01/30/1986. It was terminated on 06/16/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8629287 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).