McGill v. Xponential Fitness LLC

Court

District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Michael H. Watson · 2,388 cases in index

Docket number

2:23-cv-03909

Cause

29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act
29 U.S.C. § 201 — Fair Labor Standards Act

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

11/22/2023

9,104 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · McGill · 409 cases
• defendant · Xponential Fitness Entertainment & Recreation · 3 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 4 Labor cases in our index naming Xponential Fitness — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is McGill v. Xponential Fitness LLC?

McGill v. Xponential Fitness LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 11/22/2023 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 2:23-cv-03909.

When was the case filed?

McGill v. Xponential Fitness LLC was filed on 11/22/2023. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 29 U.S.C. § 201 — Fair Labor Standards Act.