Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Contract Lawsuit

Meisel v. Ustaoglu

Contract Terminated 09/11/2003 District Court, E.D. New York

Meisel v. Ustaoglu is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/21/2002 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 09/11/2003.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
150 Overpayments & enforcement of judgments
Actions to recover overpaid funds or to enforce an existing judgment.
Jurisdiction
Diversity of citizenship
Date filed
10/21/2002
Date terminated
09/11/2003

21,738 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Meisel v. Ustaoglu?

Meisel v. Ustaoglu is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/21/2002 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 09/11/2003. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York.

When was the case filed?

Meisel v. Ustaoglu was filed on 10/21/2002. It was terminated on 09/11/2003.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Contract Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 13998612).