Metcalf v. Allman
Metcalf v. Allman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/17/2013 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 08/03/2015.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Dee Benson · 3,547 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:13-cv-00463
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 06/17/2013
- Date terminated
- 08/03/2015
687 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Metcalf v. Allman?
Metcalf v. Allman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/17/2013 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 08/03/2015. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:13-cv-00463.
When was the case filed?
Metcalf v. Allman was filed on 06/17/2013. It was terminated on 08/03/2015.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 18141162 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:13-cv-00463 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).