Metcalf v. Css
Metcalf v. Css is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/21/1997 in the District Court, W.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 09/02/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Michigan (W.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Richard Alan Enslen · 2,025 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:97-cv-00129
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 02/21/1997
- Date terminated
- 09/02/1998
1,881 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Metcalf v. Css?
Metcalf v. Css is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/21/1997 in the District Court, W.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 09/02/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Michigan, docket number 1:97-cv-00129.
When was the case filed?
Metcalf v. Css was filed on 02/21/1997. It was terminated on 09/02/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13792078 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:97-cv-00129 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).