Metropolitan Eye Ctr v. Summit Technology

Court

District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Paul G Rosenblatt · 2,105 cases in index

Docket number

2:98-cv-01250

Nature of suit

410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal question

Date filed

07/10/1998

Date terminated

11/28/2001

198 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Metropolitan Eye Ctr
• defendant · Summit Technology · 42 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 43 Antitrust cases in our index naming Summit Technology — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Summit Technology v. Lin
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 08/10/1999
• Brisson v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. MinnesotaFiled 06/03/1999
• Carolina Eye Assoc v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 05/05/1999
• Carolina Eye Assoc v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. New JerseyFiled 02/04/1999
• Worcester v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 12/01/1998
• Laser Eye Center Tx v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 11/09/1998

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Metropolitan Eye Ctr v. Summit Technology?

Metropolitan Eye Ctr v. Summit Technology is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 07/10/1998 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 11/28/2001. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:98-cv-01250.

When was the case filed?

Metropolitan Eye Ctr v. Summit Technology was filed on 07/10/1998. It was terminated on 11/28/2001.