Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Copyright Lawsuit

Michael v. Providence Public Library

Copyright Terminated 06/24/1988 District Court, D. Rhode Island

Michael v. Providence Public Library is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 12/09/1986 in the District Court, D. Rhode Island. The case was terminated on 06/24/1988.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Rhode Island (D.R.I.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
12/09/1986
Date terminated
06/24/1988

402 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Copyright Lawsuits

Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michael v. Providence Public Library?

Michael v. Providence Public Library is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 12/09/1986 in the District Court, D. Rhode Island. The case was terminated on 06/24/1988. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Rhode Island.

When was the case filed?

Michael v. Providence Public Library was filed on 12/09/1986. It was terminated on 06/24/1988.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Copyright Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8524029 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).