Michael v. USA
Michael v. USA is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/11/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 08/06/2003.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Iowa (N.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Mark W Bennett · 1,796 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:03-cv-04012
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 02/11/2003
- Date terminated
- 08/06/2003
551 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Michael v. USA?
Michael v. USA is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/11/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 08/06/2003. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Iowa, docket number 5:03-cv-04012.
When was the case filed?
Michael v. USA was filed on 02/11/2003. It was terminated on 08/06/2003.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 20368162 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:03-cv-04012 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).