Minter v. Dynm
Minter v. Dynm is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/05/1990 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 02/20/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. South Carolina (D.S.C.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Henry M Herlong, Jr · 3,397 cases in index
- Docket number
- 7:90-cv-02882
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/05/1990
- Date terminated
- 02/20/1992
20,898 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Minter v. Dynm?
Minter v. Dynm is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/05/1990 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 02/20/1992. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. South Carolina, docket number 7:90-cv-02882.
When was the case filed?
Minter v. Dynm was filed on 12/05/1990. It was terminated on 02/20/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9355279 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 7:90-cv-02882 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).