Mirage Studios v. Lau
Mirage Studios v. Lau is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/23/1993 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 05/02/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California (N.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James Ware · 3,493 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:93-cv-20540
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/23/1993
- Date terminated
- 05/02/1994
4,005 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Mirage Studios · 22 cases
- defendant · Lau · 177 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mirage Studios v. Lau?
Mirage Studios v. Lau is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/23/1993 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 05/02/1994. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. California, docket number 5:93-cv-20540.
When was the case filed?
Mirage Studios v. Lau was filed on 07/23/1993. It was terminated on 05/02/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9847315 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:93-cv-20540 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).