Moen v. O'Hara
Moen v. O'Hara is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/30/1995 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 04/14/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. Illinois (C.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael M. Mihm · 2,633 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:95-cv-04009
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/30/1995
- Date terminated
- 04/14/1995
156 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Moen v. O'Hara?
Moen v. O'Hara is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/30/1995 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 04/14/1995. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. Illinois, docket number 4:95-cv-04009.
When was the case filed?
Moen v. O'Hara was filed on 01/30/1995. It was terminated on 04/14/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10005302 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:95-cv-04009 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).