Mollica v. Restaneo
Mollica v. Restaneo is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 12/09/1996 in the District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 07/17/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania (W.D. Pa.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Gary L. Lancaster · 2,218 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:96-cv-02210
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/09/1996
- Date terminated
- 07/17/1998
712 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mollica v. Restaneo?
Mollica v. Restaneo is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 12/09/1996 in the District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 07/17/1998. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, docket number 2:96-cv-02210.
When was the case filed?
Mollica v. Restaneo was filed on 12/09/1996. It was terminated on 07/17/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10543750 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:96-cv-02210 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).