Moran v. Marantette & Co
Moran v. Marantette & Co is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 01/06/1988 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 01/19/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George La Plata · 1,542 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:88-cv-60005
- Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutionality of state statutes
Challenges to the constitutionality of a state statute. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/06/1988
- Date terminated
- 01/19/1989
1,479 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Moran · 958 cases
- defendant · Marantette & Co · 6 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
MARANTETTE & CO is named in 6 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Moran v. Marantette & Co?
Moran v. Marantette & Co is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 01/06/1988 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 01/19/1989. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 5:88-cv-60005.
When was the case filed?
Moran v. Marantette & Co was filed on 01/06/1988. It was terminated on 01/19/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8832336 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:88-cv-60005 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).