Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Rumely

Court

District Court, N.D. Indiana (N.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Jon E DeGuilio · 769 cases in index

Docket number

3:18-cv-00028

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

None

Date filed

01/17/2018

Date terminated

06/26/2019

4,361 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Morgan Stanley Investment Banking & Securities · 883 cases
• defendant · Rumely

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Rumely?

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Rumely is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 01/17/2018 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 06/26/2019. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Indiana, docket number 3:18-cv-00028.

When was the case filed?

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Rumely was filed on 01/17/2018. It was terminated on 06/26/2019.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.