Morris v. Rosenthal
Morris v. Rosenthal is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 05/19/2015 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 10/02/2015.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William P. Dimitrouleas · 8,023 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:15-cv-61048
- Cause
- 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
15 U.S.C. § 1692 — Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Nature of suit
- 290 Real Property: Other
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 05/19/2015
- Date terminated
- 10/02/2015
1,362 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Morris v. Rosenthal?
Morris v. Rosenthal is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 05/19/2015 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 10/02/2015. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 0:15-cv-61048.
When was the case filed?
Morris v. Rosenthal was filed on 05/19/2015. It was terminated on 10/02/2015.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1692 — Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 6075276 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:15-cv-61048 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).