Mulligan v. Abbott
Mulligan v. Abbott is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/11/2011 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 08/28/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Dee Benson · 3,547 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:11-cv-00045
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 01/11/2011
- Date terminated
- 08/28/2014
687 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mulligan v. Abbott?
Mulligan v. Abbott is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/11/2011 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 08/28/2014. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:11-cv-00045.
When was the case filed?
Mulligan v. Abbott was filed on 01/11/2011. It was terminated on 08/28/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14396822 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:11-cv-00045 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).