Nam v. Kim
Nam v. Kim is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/06/1991 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 12/03/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Maryanne Trump Barry · 2,106 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:91-cv-00943
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 03/06/1991
- Date terminated
- 12/03/1991
4,475 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Nam v. Kim?
Nam v. Kim is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/06/1991 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 12/03/1991. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey, docket number 2:91-cv-00943.
When was the case filed?
Nam v. Kim was filed on 03/06/1991. It was terminated on 12/03/1991.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9324437 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:91-cv-00943 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).